Platform, applications
ESGreen Evidence Assessment: ESG maturity measured with documentary evidence
ESGreen Evidence Assessment evaluates companies' ESG maturity, with AI support, through questionnaires tailored to size and field of activity. The questions follow national and international criteria.
- Legal name
- Exemplo Serviços Ltda.
- CNPJ
- EX.EMP.LO2/0001-43
-
Environmental policy
Consistent evidence
EV-2026-09-30-0371 -
Operating license
Consistent evidence
EV-2026-09-30-0379 -
Health and safety
Pending evidence
EV-2026-09-30-0386 -
Whistleblower channel
Inconsistent evidence
EV-2026-09-30-0393 -
Code of conduct
Consistent evidence
EV-2026-09-30-0398
Context
A questionnaire without evidence is a self-declaration.
Clients, financial institutions and buyers ask suppliers and partners to demonstrate their ESG practices. When the answer comes without a document, the assessment cannot be compared from one year to the next or across companies, and it does not hold up in an audit.
For the market, sustainability cannot depend on self-declaration.
How it works
From question to evidence, in five steps
-
Tailored questionnaire
Questions are adapted to the size and CNAE of the company assessed, drawing on 400+ ESG criteria.
-
Answer with evidence
Every answer must be backed by documentary evidence, such as policies, licenses, reports and records.
-
AI-supported document review with human oversight
AI organizes the reading of each document and points out what does not match the answer, including signs of a tampered document, citing the pages. An ESGreen analyst reviews each analysis and decides.
-
Cross-checked against public and private data
Answers are compared with what public sources show about the company, through the ESGreen Score.
-
Maturity score and history
The company receives a maturity score per pillar and a maturity level, with improvement points per criterion and the annual history of its progress.
Answer credibility
Evidence, not declarations.
Clear rules for respondents and an ESGreen analyst on every review.
-
“Fully meets” only with a document
Anyone who declares full compliance attaches the document that supports the answer.
-
“Not applicable” only with a justification
Anyone who marks a criterion as not applicable explains why, and the explanation is recorded.
-
AI with human review
AI organizes the reading of each document and points out what does not match the answer, including signs of a tampered document, citing the pages. An ESGreen analyst reviews each analysis and decides, and the company receives a correction request when something does not add up.
AI suggests and organizes. The analyst decides.
Deliverables
A standardized, comparable diagnosis
- ESG maturity score and sector benchmarking
- Score per pillar (Environmental, Social and Governance), compared with the average of companies of the same size and CNAE.
- Improvement points per criterion
- What still needs evidence, criterion by criterion, to guide the improvement plan.
- Alignment with the UN SDGs
- The answers show how the company aligns with each of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals.
- Annual history
- How the score evolves from one assessment cycle to the next.
- Document trail
- Each answer linked to the document that supports it and to the outcome of the review.
- Maturity level
- Soil, Seed, Root, Tree or Fruit: the company's stage, defined by the self-assessment result.
Maturity levels
From the first step to consolidated practice
The self-assessment result places the company at a maturity level. The level shows where it stands and what it needs to advance.
- Soil
- Seed
- Root
- Tree
- Fruit
In ESGreen Score 2.0, proven maturity adds points and never takes them away.
Program management
The whole program in view for the contracting party
A dashboard tracks supplier participation and answer quality, from the questionnaire sent to the final ranking.
- Before sending
- Check which questions apply to a given CNAE and size, the importance of each one in the score, whether it requires a document and the answering guidance.
- Progress and response rate
- Who has responded, who still has to, and the program's response rate, so you can follow up on participation at the right time.
- Pillar with the lowest average
- Shows where the supply chain is weakest: Environmental, Social or Governance.
- Evidence index
- The share of answers backed by a document.
- Sector benchmarking
- Each company's score against the average for the same size and CNAE.
- Ranking and export
- Companies ranked by score, with a list ready to export.
Program dashboard
- Companies invited
- 180
- Questionnaires completed
- 112
- Response rate
- 62%
- Evidence index
- 64%
- responses with a document
- Pillar with the lowest average
- Social
Program participation
- Already responded 62%
- Still pending 38%
For those who request ESG maturity and those who demonstrate it
-
Procurement, supplier qualification and sustainability at large companies
Assess the ESG maturity of the supply chain with the same criteria for everyone.
-
Financial institutions
Understand the practices of clients and suppliers beyond what public data shows.
-
Companies assessed
Show clients, and qualification and RFP processes, what is already in place, with documents.
References
National and international criteria, adapted to size and sector
- UN SDGs The 17 goals as a parameter axis for the assessment.
- GRI 2-6 and 3-3 Information on the value chain and the management of material topics in sustainability reports.
- CMN 4.945 (PRSAC) Social and environmental criteria applied to suppliers of financial institutions.
- Decree 11,129/2022 Third-party due diligence in integrity programs.
- International buyer questionnaires Supply chain requirements linked to the EUDR and the CSDDD.
The assessment helps the institution and the company assessed meet these references, with documentary evidence. Informational content; does not constitute legal advice.
From good intentions to a demonstrable structure
- ESG criteria linked to the TSB
- 750+
Data as of Sep 2026. Source: ESGreen database.
“Based on this model, we were able to turn good intentions into a solid structure: we created policies, formalized processes and made concrete progress. This was essential for us to be qualified as a supplier by a multinational and to handle RFPs with confidence.”
“In the tool, we can see the score, which helped us get a realistic view of our progress each year, of where we are and where we can improve.”
Delivery formats
Where the assessment applies
- Questionnaire on the platform With documents submitted per criterion.
- Dashboard With the score per pillar, improvement points and history.
- Assessment report For the company assessed and for whoever commissioned it.
What Evidence Assessment is, and what it is not
Evidence Assessment measures ESG maturity based on documentary evidence and public data. It does not replace an audit, independent assurance or verification by accredited verifiers, and the result does not constitute a credit rating.
Frequently asked questions
Short answers to the most common questions.
Still have questions? Talk to an expert
What is ESGreen Evidence Assessment?
It is an ESG maturity assessment based on a questionnaire tailored to company size and CNAE, in which every answer is backed by documentary evidence analyzed with the support of artificial intelligence.
How many criteria does the assessment use?
The base has 400+ ESG criteria. Each company's questionnaire uses the criteria that apply to its size and CNAE (economic activity code).
How is artificial intelligence used?
AI supports the analysis of the documents submitted: it points out what does not match the answer and flags evidence that is pending, inconsistent or shows signs of tampering, citing the pages. An ESGreen analyst reviews each analysis and decides. The criteria and methodology are defined by ESGreen.
Who reviews the AI analysis?
An ESGreen analyst. AI suggests and organizes; the analyst reviews each analysis, decides and, when something does not match, asks the company assessed for a correction. The decision about the supplier remains with the contracting party.
Does Evidence Assessment replace an ESG audit?
No. The assessment produces a maturity score based on evidence. It does not attest legal compliance and does not replace an audit, independent assurance or verification by accredited verifiers.
What are the maturity levels?
They are the company's stages in the self-assessment: Soil, Seed, Root, Tree and Fruit, from the initial stage to consolidated practice. The level shows where the company stands and what it needs to advance. In ESGreen Score 2.0, proven maturity adds points and never takes them away.
How does the client track the program?
Through a dashboard showing questionnaire progress, the response rate, the pillar with the lowest average, the evidence index (the share of answers with a document) and the company ranking, with export. Before sending, the client checks which questions apply to each CNAE and size.
How often is the company assessed?
The assessment runs in cycles, and the platform keeps the annual history to show how the score evolves.
How is it different from Pre-assessment and Monitoring?
Pre-assessment and Monitoring use public, regulatory and global data about the company, without depending on it. Evidence Assessment starts from the practices the company itself declares and proves with documents, and cross-checks those answers against public data.
Assess the ESG maturity of your supply chain with evidence.
Book 30 minutes. We will show you the questionnaire, the document review and the results dashboard.
- Demo with cases from your segment
- Pre-assessment of CNPJs in your base
- Climate exposure readout for operations and assets
Or write to contato@esgreen.com.br